Sunday, March 26, 2023

Road To Paris: Episode 5


Well, it’s been a while since the last episode of the Road to Paris series. There have been quite a few developments in the journey. Here is a look at the major ones in the past 5 months.

Quota Places
Athletics
  • 20 km Walk (M)Akashdeep Singh breaks the National record to beat the Olympics qualifying standard. He was joined by Vikash Singh & Paramjeet Bisht, making it max qualifiers in a single event for India!
  • 20 km Walk (W) – Priyanka Goswami qualifies for the Olympics for the second time in a row.
In other news
Highs
  • Boxing: Nitu Ghanghas, Saweety Boora, Nikhat Zareen & Lovlina Borgohain became World Champions, although the field was slightly depleted. Unfortunately, only Nikhat and Lovlina are in Olympics weight categories.
  • Weightlifting: Mirabai Chanu lifts the Silver Medal in World Weightlifting Championships.
  • Manika Batra’s bronze medal at the Asian TT championships after a disappointing run at the Commonwealth Games – seems to be back on track to success
  • The Women’s Hockey Team won the Nations Cup and qualified for the next season of Pro Hockey League. They had finished 3rd last time in the Pro Hockey League, so should not have been sent to the qualifiers in the first place!
  • The Badminton team won a Bronze medal at the Mixed Asia Teams Championships, while Treesa Jolly-Gayatri Gopichand duo proved that their last year’s run in the All England Championships was no fluke by again reaching the semi-finals this year.
  • Tennis: Rohan Bopanna became the oldest man to win an ATP 1000 series event. At 43, he is still going strong but does he have a partner for the Paris Games. Meanwhile Sania Mirza has called time on her glittering career. And there is no successor for her.
Disappointments
Men’s Hockey Team finished 9th in a Home World Cup.

Controversies
The battle between the top wrestlers and the Wrestling Federation. Hopefully a rigorous probe will result in a clearing out this mess!

So as usual, with Indian sports it has been a case of some good, some bad, and some downright ugly! Hopefully we will have better tidings in the next edition.

Till Next Time!

Qualification Summary for Team India: Sports: 2, Events 5, Entries:7, Athletes: 7

Links: Road To Paris: Episode 4 

Saturday, March 25, 2023

Learn N Blog #25: The IPCC Report

“Our world needs climate action on all fronts: everything, everywhere, all at once.” - António Guterres, on the release of the 6th IPCC Report.

Mr. Guterres has been known to use cultural references in talks on Climate Change. Remember the “Highway to Hell” reference during COP27!

“There is a rapidly closing window of opportunity to secure a livable and sustainable future for all….the choices and actions implemented in this decade [i.e., by 2030] will have impacts now and for thousands of years” – This is the key messages from latest report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). And hence the call from action by Mr. Guterres.

IPCC has been publishing the reports on Climate Change since early 1990s. Following is a brief history of the reports, their findings & imapct.

1st Report (1992)
Finding: predicted a global temperature rise of about 2C by 2025, compared with the period before the industrial revolution that sparked the mass burning of fossil fuels. (In 2023, the rise is 1.4C.)
Impact: Creation of UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. 

2nd Report (1995)
Finding: Climate change is likely to have wide-ranging and mostly adverse impacts on human health, with significant loss of life. 
An Appeal: Where there is a lack of full scientific certainty, [countries] should: ‘take precautionary measures to anticipate, prevent or minimize the causes of climate change and mitigate its adverse effects’.

3rd Report (2001)
Finding: There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities. 
A Warning: Impacts of climate change will fall disproportionately upon developing countries and the poor persons within all countries.

4th Report (2007)
Finding: Delayed emission reductions significantly constrain the opportunities to achieve lower stabilization levels and increase the risk of more severe climate change impacts. The evidence leads to a simple conclusion: the benefits of strong and early action far outweigh the economic costs of not acting … delay would be dangerous and much more costly. 
Impact: IPCC was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007. However, the Global Financial Crisis of 2008 put the report on its backburner. Hope the same doesn’t hit the 2023 report!

5th Report (2014)
Finding: Human influence on the climate system is clear. Recent climate changes have had widespread impacts on human and natural systems [and] many of the observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia. 
Impact: The report laid the scientific ground for the UN’s Paris agreement in 2015, which for the first time spurred most nations to cut emissions.

Special Report (2018):
Finding: Contrasted the stark difference between 1.5 & 2.5 C temperature difference

6th Report (2023)
Key messages: In the near-term, global warming is more likely than not to reach 1.5C even under a very low emission scenario. And any given future warming level, many climate-related risks are higher than [previously] assessed. “Without a strengthening of policies, global warming of 3.2C is projected by 2100.”
The Three signposts
  1. Climate crisis is fundamentally a crisis of injustice: “The 10% of households with the highest per capita emissions contribute 34-45% of global consumption-based emissions, while the bottom 50% contribute 13-15%.” The climate emergency cannot end without addressing the inequalities of income and gender for the simple reason that “social trust” is required for “transformative change”.
  2. Any new fossil fuel developments are utterly incompatible with the net zero emissions required. “Projected CO2 emissions from existing fossil fuel infrastructure without additional abatement would exceed the remaining carbon budget for 1.5C,” the report says. It implies that the oil, gas and coal projects already in operation will lead to rise beyond 1.5C, unless carbon capture technology works at scale (yet unproven).
  3. Need for technology and finance: “Feasible, effective, and low-cost options and adaptation are already available.” Solar and wind power, energy efficiency, cuts in methane emissions and halting the destruction of forests are the key ones.
The report acknowledges the daunting task at hand. “The systemic change required to achieve rapid and deep emissions reductions and transformative adaptation to climate change is unprecedented in terms of scale [and] near-term actions involve high up-front investments.” While money is key the report concludes “the costs of climate action are clearly lower than the damages climate chaos will cause.”

Given the dire warnings, as Mr. Guterres says, tackling climate change will require actions (policy, technology, monetary) everything, everywhere, all at once.

Links:
Previously on Learn N Blog: Ozone Depletion & Rejuvenation 

Sunday, March 19, 2023

Learn N Blog #24: Ozone Depletion & Rejuvenation

Rio Declaration
Kyoto Protocol
Net Zero Pledges

I always wonder if these myriad conferences and agreements on climate have ever had any real impact on the world. Most climate conferences seem to be about making the right noises and then coming back next year to do more of the same!

However, while there is skepticism about the real impact of these conferences and agreements, there is one area in which collective action has yielded the desired results. The “hole” in the Ozone layer over Antarctica is now shrinking and this is attributed directly to the results of the Montreal Protocol of 1987.

Ozone Depletion: observed in the 1970s, there was a depletion of ~4% in the total amount of Ozone in the Earth’s atmosphere.

The Antarctic Ozone Hole: Discovered in 1980s, it is not exactly a hole, but rather a reduction in the amount of ozone in different regions of the atmosphere over Antarctica. The reduction is not uniform. Similar “holes”, but of much smaller size have also been observed in the Arctic and Tibet.

Chief Causes: Increased amount of chemicals emissions – chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) present in refrigerants. These compounds when released, eventually break down the atmospheric Ozone into Oxygen.

Impact of Ozone Depletion: The Ozone layer prevents the harmful Ultra-violet rays from entering the earth’s atmosphere. With its depletion, it would lead to increased incidences of skin cancer, sunburns, cataracts and blindness in humans, increased temperatures globally, reduced crop yields etc.

Montreal Protocol, 1987: required countries to stop producing substances that damage the ozone layer, such as CFCs. The Montreal Protocol happens to be the only Treaty ratified by all UN members!

Impact of the Montreal Protocol: Post the ban on CFCs production in accordance with the Montreal Protocol from 1989 onwards, there has been a steady change in the atmospheric ozone. The depletion stopped in mid-1990s and the levels have been recovering. Currently, the hole in the Ozone layer has been the smallest since its discovery in 1980s. And as per current projections, the Ozone Layer is expected to completely regenerate by 2045! Truly, a remarkable success case.

As per UNEP, this has also helped in avoiding 0.5C of global warming by 2050!

Other Causes of Changes: There are seasonal changes to the amount of Ozone in the atmosphere. The depletion is greatest during spring and lowest in winter (when there is hardly any light) Major volcanic eruptions can also cause change in the composition. E.g., the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai volcanic eruption of 2022 could have reversed the decline in the growth.

The Challenge
It took 4 decades for the damage to take place and another 7 decades+ to reverse it. Hope that we have not reached the irreversible stage in other areas!

However, there is one more challenge – the deniers. Every claim is denied backed by counter-research which seems equally credible. Whether the ozone layer is depleting, or it is caused by CFCs, or if ozone depletion does any damage – all of these have been disputed subjects by both scientists and the lobbyists.

A Case of Optimism
The reversal of the Ozone depletion through collective action does present a case of hope for the larger issue of Climate Change as well. While it took 4 decades for the damage to be noticed, its reversal is taking much longer. Just showing the scale of the task at hand. But at least, we have an example of how to yield the right result - Identifying the source and then collectively taking the corrective action to prevent permanent damage!

P.S. Unintentionally this post is getting published on the day Google is celebrating the birthday of Mario Molina, who discovered the harmful effects of CFCs on the Ozone layer, with a doodle.

Links:
  • Global Climate Agreements: CFR  
  • Monitoring the Ozone Layer: Atmosphere 
Previously on Learn N Blog: The Global Methane Pledge

Sunday, March 12, 2023

Learn N Blog #23: Global Methane Pledge

What Is It? 
The Global Methane Pledge aims to reduce methane emissions to bring down the global temperature increase.

When was it launched? 
November 2021, in Glasgow at COP26

What do the participants have to do?
Participants joining the Pledge agree to take voluntary actions to contribute to a collective effort to reduce global methane emissions by at least 30 percent from 2020 levels by 2030, which could eliminate over 0.2˚C warming by 2050. This is a global, not a national reduction target.

Participants also commit to moving towards using the highest tier IPCC good practice inventory methodologies, as well as working to continuously improve the accuracy, transparency, consistency, comparability, and completeness of national greenhouse gas inventory reporting under the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement, and to provide greater transparency in key sectors.

The Pledge aims to catalyze global action and strengthen support for existing international methane emission reduction initiatives to advance technical and policy work that will serve to underpin Participants’ domestic actions. The Pledge also recognizes the essential roles that private sector, development banks, financial institutions and philanthropy play to support implementation of the Pledge and welcomes their efforts and engagement.

What are the Action Areas? 
It is a wide ranging field covering improved emissions measurement and tracking, reducing food & water wastage, policy changes to regulating emissions from various industries especially oil & gas

Who are participating? 
Approximately 150 countries have taken the pledge including USA and EU.

Who are the Notable Absentees? 
China, India, Russia – 3 of the Top 5 methane emitters have NOT taken the pledge!

Why India did not sign?
The chief reasons given by the Indian govt are
  • Methane emissions are survival emissions in India and not ‘luxury’ emissions, as in the case of the West.
  • Agriculture is not included in India’s emission intensity target
  • Shifting of CO2 reduction burden to methane reduction: CO2 the predominant gas responsible for climate change has a lifetime of 100-1,000 years, while methane has 12 years
  • Low global contribution to methane emissions by the Indian livestock
  • Methane Pledge outside the ambit of the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement
So will the Pledge work? 
Wait and watch. Like every climate related announcement and signing, this also needs time for any actual impact to be visible! However, given that some of the biggest countries have not taken the pledge is seems another case of more words than actions. However, not taking the pledge doesn’t mean these countries are not taking any action in this regard and vice versa. And given that actions are voluntary, there is no compulsion on even those taking the pledge to take any real action.

Links:
  • Global Methane Pledge: Home Page 
  • IEA Methane Tracker: IEA 
  • India not signing the pledger: Link
Previously on Learn N Blog: The Energy Trilemma

Sunday, March 05, 2023

Learn N Blog #22: The Energy Trilemma

What is it?
the need to find balance between energy security, affordability, and sustainability and its impact on everyday lives.

Who coined it? 
The World Energy Council in 2010. The Index is prepared annually.

What are the Three Elements?
  • Energy Security measures a nation’s capacity to meet current and future energy demand reliably with minimal disruption to supplies from any disruption.
  • Energy Equity assesses a country’s ability to provide universal access to reliable, affordable, and abundant energy for domestic and commercial use.
  • Environmental Sustainability of energy systems represents the transition of a country’s energy system towards mitigating and avoiding potential environmental harm and climate change impacts.

Why the focus?
It’s a balance between short-term pain (definitely) and long-term gain (hopefully). How countries can aim for Net Zero Ambitions while keeping the current energy security in mind. The situation has been exacerbated by the combined impact of the Covid19 pandemic and subsequent lockdowns followed by the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The consequent global supply chain disruptions, increased living costs and global recession fears have just added to the uncertainty.

Countries are looking at securing their own energy resources at the cheapest price. Hence Russian oil is still available at a discount for the willing buyers, coal production has been increased, plans to phase out nuclear power plants have been shelved, there is increased capital expenditure on hydrocarbons as well as renewables! Regulations are being modified to increase the scope of what counts as “clean energy”.

All this to resolve the energy trilemma. It’s not an easy task and there is no one-size-fits-all solution either. After all, each country has their own varied requirements and available resources. And they will have to take their own measures to attain Net Zero!

Links:
  • Online tool to track energy trilemma index for each country: World Energy  
  • Gas & Nuclear are Green Energy: CNBC 
Previously on Learn N Blog: Lithium Reserves Estimation